Definition: Yea, thou shalt be broken in the midst of the uncircumcised, and shalt lie with [them that are] slain with the sword.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezekiel 32:28. It’s a really complex and often misunderstood passage, so we'll go through it step-by-step. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: This verse is about violence and intimacy – specifically, violence within a relationship. Let’s unpack it: “Yea, thou shalt be broken in the midst of the uncircumcised…” "Uncircumcised" means not circumcised (the small strip of skin around the neck and belly that Jewish people were traditionally given). This refers to Gentiles – non-Jewish people. The word “midst” emphasizes that this is happening within a relationship with a Jew. "...and shalt lie with [them] that are slain with the sword.” This is the most shocking part. It means that a Jewish man (or woman) who has been killed in battle – perhaps by a Roman soldier or another enemy – is allowed to be intimate with them. The word “slain” implies death, and "with the sword" suggests violence was used in their demise. So, what's the overall message? This verse speaks to a disturbing idea: that violence within relationships can be tolerated or even encouraged. It’s suggesting that there’s a place for intimacy – perhaps even a kind of “comfort” – in situations where violence has occurred and someone has been killed. Important Context & Why it's Controversial: This verse is incredibly controversial and has been interpreted in various ways throughout history. Here's why: The Historical Context: Ezekiel was writing during a time of intense political conflict between the Jewish people and the Roman Empire. The Romans were expanding their control over Judea, and this passage is often seen as reflecting anxieties about rebellion and the potential for violence within the Jewish community. The Interpretation: Many scholars believe that Ezekiel wasn't intending a literal endorsement of this practice. Instead, it was a warning against allowing any kind of violence to undermine peace and trust within communities. It highlights the danger of conflict and the importance of maintaining harmony. In short, this verse is a challenging and provocative passage that explores themes of violence, intimacy, and the potential for darkness within relationships. --- Disclaimer: I'm providing this explanation based on the generally accepted interpretation of the text. It’s crucial to approach religious texts with sensitivity and understanding, recognizing they can be complex and open to different interpretations. Do you have any specific questions about this verse that you’d like me to answer? For example, are you curious about: The historical context surrounding it? Different theological perspectives on the meaning of the verse?